Feb 6, 2008

Top bird: My favorite multimedia story of 2007

Who would have thought that chickens in Missoula could be so funny? Or that they would make a great subject for a multimedia project?

Well, Anne Medley knew. Her video , "Missoula Squabbles Over Urban Chickens" tells a story of a classic struggle of where to draw the line in allowing rural elements to enter city life. It's wonderful in so many ways. I don't know what to praise most - the opening money shot of the chicken at the door .... the subtle use of cluck, cluck, clucking sounds ... the talk of neighbor-on-neighbor fights paired with the image of a chicken trying to peck another chicken's eyes out ... the banjo instrumental of "America The Beautiful" playing behind a chicken photo montage ... or just the quote: "I'm mostly neutral but I guess slightly pro-chicken."

I first saw this video a couple of months ago and have watched it about a dozen times since. And I still enjoy it.

Beautifully shot. Hilarious. Just plain brilliant.

This is what the future of journalism should look like. Bravo to Anne and to www.NewWest.net . I stumbled across New West this fall and was surprised by the quality of the content and the spread of the coverage area (Oregon, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming). After e-subscribing, I have consistently been enticed to return.

They call it "a next-generation media company" and I've been keeping an eye on it because of its online-only format, wondering if they might have figured out the mystery that seems to be eluding so many news outlets: How to produce quality journalism and profits.

As far as I can tell they must be doing something right because they've actually recently added a print magazine .



Has that happened before? Starting out online-only and moving to print? Interesting.... I may just have to subscribe to that as well.

The Best Creative Nonfiction, vol. 2


One of my stories, The Egg and I about egg donation, published this past summer on Etude has been chosen to be included in the 2008 edition of The Best Creative Nonfiction .

Here's a story , announcing the news, which I've copied below.

SOJC graduate student Katie Campbell among Literary Nonfiction’s “cutting-edge best.”
by Zanne Miller — last modified 04:34 PM Thu Jan 03, 2008
Literary Nonfiction student Katie Campbell's essay "The Egg and I," published in the summer 2007 Etude, has just been chosen for inclusion in The Best Creative Nonfiction vol. 2, edited by Lee Gutkind, to be published July 2008 by W.W. Norton & Company.

Literary Nonfiction student Katie Campbell's essay "The Egg and I," published in the summer 2007 Etude, has just been chosen for inclusion in The Best Creative Nonfiction vol. 2, edited by Lee Gutkind, to be published July 2008 by W.W. Norton & Company. Gutkind, editor of the journal Creative Nonfiction and professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh, has been called the “Godfather of Creative Nonfiction”; the book is described as “Narrative nonfiction at its cutting-edge best from writers at the cusp of recognition and fame.”

Campbell “pretty much has it all,” says Lauren Kessler, professor and director of the SOJC’s program in literary nonfiction. “She knows a good story when she sees it and has the talent and skill to develop it. During her first year in the program, she developed a number of significant stories that involved both traditional journalistic research and immersion fieldwork. "The Egg and I" was one of those -- carefully researched, beautifully and sensitively crafted. A gem, really. I am thrilled, delighted—and not at all surprised—that it was chosen for inclusion in the anthology.”

Campbell, who has a B.A. in journalism and English (2002) from the College of St. Catherine in St. Paul, Minn., has worked as a reporter and photographer at newspapers in Minnesota, Florida, and Wales. She and her partner, Michael Werner (also an LNF student), came to the SOJC in fall 2006 after living in Costa Rica for two years, where they taught English and were later hired to be co-directors of the English program at Universidad Latina.

Below, an interview with Katie Campbell.

Q. How did you feel learning your story was chosen for the anthology?
A. I got the news in an email and my feelings went something like this: Confusion followed by the sensation that I was going to either faint or vomit. Then I looked up the publishing company to make sure that it was actually the same Norton of the Norton anthologies. Then I just sat there shocked. Having my story being selected is a huge honor. I’m thrilled really. So often the emotional experience of being a writer is up and down. There have been many times when I’ve wondered if I’m any good at it at all, so getting this news was like receiving a nod of assurance that I have some business being in the business of writing.

Q. Tell me about the story—what gave you the idea to do it?
A. I didn’t think my decision of whether to donate my eggs was something to write about until months after I first saw the egg donation advertisement. I wasn’t looking for an immersion journalism project. It really started out as something that caught my eye as a way to support myself during grad school. When I did start thinking about writing about it, I thought it would only really become a story if I went through with it. But I wasn’t just going to donate my eggs so I could write about the procedure firsthand. That would be messed up. As I contemplated donation and did all the research to make an informed decision, I realized there was a lot of the tension and internal conflict surrounding the decision itself. I talked to a lot of my friends and family members at the time and they were very interested in learning about my decision-making process. Across the board everyone I talked to was eager to find out my final decision. It seemed clear then that it was a story worth writing whether or not I ended up donating.

Q. It's very personal—was that easier or more difficult to write than other pieces?
A. I usually write about other people because I tend to think other people lives are way more interesting than my own. Also my background is in newspaper reporting and there just isn’t much room for personal narrative writing. So while I don’t shy away from writing in first-person if a piece calls for it, this is one of the few stories I’ve written that really is all about me. And I’m not sure whether it was easier to write than non-personal stories. In some respects yes and in others no. One thing I’ve always thought was really hard about writing about other people is knowing whether I’m getting a good sense of the truth when I’m reporting. I always want to know what people are or were thinking and feeling at specific times or why they reacted to something the way they did, but that takes a ton of self analysis and some people aren’t used to being that introspective or they tell me what they think I want to hear. It’s hard to know if they’re being honest. And when I’m observing, I’m trying to interpret their actions and reactions and figure out what it all means and that’s incredibly challenging. It’s difficult to know if I’m getting it right. It was much easier to analyze myself and I feel like I was able to interpret my actions in a way that accurately reflected their meanings. On the other hand, being so open about my personal life was very difficult. It took me months before I was able to share the story with anyone besides my boyfriend and my professor Lauren Kessler. I was worried that people would judge me and I had to get over that.

Q. What made you choose the LNF program?
A. I took a graduate-level course in Literary Nonfiction the final semester of my undergraduate career and I fell in love with the genre. After graduating I began experimenting with trying to write in that style in my newspaper articles and when it came time to look for graduate school options I really wanted to hone those literary writing techniques. This is the only graduate journalism program that’s focused exactly on that, so it seemed like the perfect choice.

Q. How has the experience been?
A. I’m so happy to be here in the J-school and in the LNF program. Lauren is a fabulous writer and a wonderful teacher and I feel like I’ve grown so much as a writer/reporter in the past year. During our LNF writing workshops last year, I’d leave class knowing exactly what I had to do to put together a good piece. I knew what to look for while reporting and how to think about structure. Lauren breaks it down to the essential parts and gives us the tools to be great writers. She also really de-mystifies the process, which does a lot to empower the writer. I had high hopes for what the LNF program could be and it’s been even better than I imagined. I seriously love studying here and I don’t want to leave.

Q. What are you working on now?
A. I’m co-producing a historical documentary for Oregon Public Broadcasting on WWII conscientious objectors who were interned in work camps here in Oregon. I’m also in the beginning stages of research for a book proposal on environmental activism.

Reviewing Elizabeth Hess's biography of a talking chimp


Some writers can make something as bland as bananas interesting by the way they write. Others choose a subject matter that is so inherently fascinating that the prose simply has to stay out of the way of the material. Elizabeth Hess’s Nim Chimpsky: The Chimp Who Would Be Human falls into the second category.

Essentially an animal’s biography, the book chronicles the at times heartbreaking birth-to-death journey of Nim Chimpsky, the chimpanzee at the center of the much-publicized 1970s experiment that aimed to disprove linguist Noam Chompsky’s claim that language was a uniquely human trait.

Could a baby chimp be raised among humans and learn to communicate with people using American Sign Language? That was the question the researchers planned to answer. What do you do with an animal that is half wild and half human? That’s the question they never anticipated.

The first half of the book, which focuses on Project Nim, as the experiment was called, is a page-turner. Hess’s prose is both educational and entertaining. It moves along so easily that I could almost overlook the fact that Hess introduces us to 50 named characters in the first 50-odd pages.

The book’s real muscle comes from its deep reportage. Hess gathered incredible details from interviews with the people who moved in and out of Nim’s life: those who raised him like a son, those who taught him his first words, those who became his advocates later in life and those who would ultimately fail him. Hess fills in the gaps by combing through countless academic papers, books and articles.

Through the course of the book, Nim rightly becomes its heart and soul, growing into a complex character, a lovable and sympathetic protagonist you can’t help but root for.

Post-experiment life for Nim is, sadly, much less interesting. Nobody is paying attention to the chimp’s day-to-day activities. It’s a biographer’s perennial challenge. Some chapters of a life, chimp or human, aren’t well-documented. Hess’s solution? Shift focus to other researchers conducting experiments on different chimps. During this nearly 100-page section, the plot plods through some tedious detours, making us wait a long time to find out what happens to our primate friend. But like the rest of the world, I’d fallen for Nim and cared little to invest emotionally in the twenty-some other chimps Hess introduces.

But Hess succeeds on a critical point: The story of Nim is hardly forgettable.

--
For more reviews of new works in narrative nonfiction, such as David Shields' new book "The Thing About Life Is That One Day You'll Be Dead," visit Etude's Books in Brief .

Twitter Updates

Favorite me

Add to Technorati Favorites